Major update after Tottenham 3-1 Coventry. The old version of this page said Spurs were still winless. That is now obsolete. Tottenham have their first league victory of the season, James Maddison scored on his first league start in 536 days, Omar Marmoush scored his first Spurs goal and Dejan Kulusevski returned after 526 days out.
The short answer
Tottenham move from:
AVOID / watch
to:
WATCH / selective buy.
Current FPL ranking:
- James Maddison — best creative route
- Omar Marmoush — best goal-upside route
- Mohammed Kudus — direct attacking involvement
- Solanke — role must be rechecked
- Kulusevski — returning watchlist
- Spurs defence — still not priority
The 3-1 win is meaningful.
Chelsea away in GW8 is the reason not to chase all of it immediately.
What changed against Coventry?
Tottenham finally won.
Goals:
- Maddison;
- Marmoush;
- Ben Davies.
Kudus assisted Maddison.
Kulusevski returned from his long injury absence.
This is the strongest attacking evidence Spurs have produced all season.
Latest FPL news
Maddison: biggest FPL riser
Maddison's goal matters.
His start matters more.
He had not started a league match for 536 days.
That changes the FPL question from:
"When will he be fit enough?"
to:
"Can he reclaim a reliable creative role?"
Maddison can offer:
- shots;
- key passes;
- set pieces;
- bonus;
- advanced central involvement.
If his minutes reach 70–80 consistently, he becomes a real mid-price option again.
Should you buy Maddison for GW8?
Not as a blind early transfer.
Reasons to wait:
- Chelsea away;
- long injury return;
- unclear 90-minute ceiling;
- Kulusevski returning;
- Spurs attack still has only one league win.
Reasons to shortlist:
- talismanic creativity;
- goal immediately on return;
- possible set-piece role;
- price likely below premium midfielders.
Verdict: WATCH / selective buy after team news.
Marmoush: first Spurs goal
Marmoush scored from distance.
That gives him the most direct fresh goal evidence.
His appeal depends on:
- starting position;
- whether he plays centrally;
- how Solanke is used;
- whether Maddison/Kudus feed him consistently.
One goal is enough to make him interesting.
It is not enough to make him essential.
Kudus: role remains useful
Kudus assisted Maddison.
He has the type of direct game FPL managers like:
- carrying;
- shots;
- chance creation;
- transition threat.
If Spurs become a better attacking team, Kudus can benefit even without being the main scorer.
The problem is price competition.
He needs to beat:
- Mbeumo;
- Groß;
- Manzambi;
- Neto;
- Rogers;
not only other Spurs players.
Kulusevski: return changes competition
Kulusevski came back after 526 days.
That is excellent for Spurs.
For FPL, it increases uncertainty.
Returning attackers can:
- take starts;
- take set pieces;
- change Maddison's role;
- change Kudus' position;
- reduce 90-minute certainty.
Do not assume the winning XI stays untouched.
Solanke
Solanke started against Coventry but did not produce the headline return.
His FPL case depends on:
- central striker role;
- expected minutes;
- penalty status;
- quality of service.
Marmoush scoring does not automatically remove Solanke.
It does increase the need to understand the front-line hierarchy.
Spurs defence
Do not buy the defence because Spurs won.
Coventry still scored.
One victory does not erase the earlier defensive instability.
Defensive buys need:
- clean-sheet evidence;
- secure starts;
- attacking/DefCon route;
- good fixtures.
Chelsea away is not the ideal entry.
Chelsea away in GW8
This fixture is why the timing matters.
Spurs finally have momentum.
Chelsea have several dangerous attackers and just won at Everton.
For GW8:
- Spurs attackers are playable;
- fresh buying is optional;
- Spurs defenders are low priority.
The better time to buy can be after we see whether the Coventry performance survives against stronger opposition.
Best Spurs asset by need
| Need | Player |
|---|---|
| Creativity + set pieces | Maddison |
| Goal threat | Marmoush |
| Direct wing threat | Kudus |
| Long-term return watch | Kulusevski |
| Forward slot | Solanke only if role remains strong |
Wildcard
Do not triple up.
A GW8 Wildcard can include one Spurs attacker only when:
- price fits;
- expected minutes are strong;
- you specifically want a differential.
The core Wildcard priorities remain:
- Haaland;
- Saka;
- Arsenal defence;
- strong Chelsea/United/Brighton value.
Spurs are now optional, not foundational.
What would move Maddison to BUY?
- Another start.
- 70+ minutes.
- Set-piece involvement.
- Advanced role.
- Strong chance creation.
If those happen at Chelsea even without a return, the buy case improves.
What would downgrade Spurs again?
- Maddison managed to 45–60;
- front-line rotation becomes chaotic;
- Chelsea dominate;
- attack returns to low shot volume.
The Coventry result is the start of a new sample, not the end of analysis.
OneFPL verdict
Tottenham are finally FPL-relevant again.
Maddison is the biggest riser.
Marmoush is the strongest goal-upside watch.
Kudus remains useful.
Kulusevski's return improves Spurs but increases competition.
The correct change is:
AVOID → WATCH / selective buy
—not
first win → triple up.
Maddison vs Mbeumo vs Groß
Maddison does not enter an empty midfield market.
He needs to compete with players who already have:
- stronger current-season minutes;
- lower prices;
- penalties or set pieces;
- proven FPL returns.
Maddison vs Mbeumo
Mbeumo has the safer current sample and Bournemouth at home.
Maddison has the more creative/talismanic ceiling if Spurs continue improving.
Maddison vs Groß
Groß has penalties and Brighton's explosive attack.
Maddison may have the better immediate fixture after the Liverpool/City stretch passes, but today Groß remains easier to trust.
That is why Maddison is a watchlist riser, not immediately top-three mid-price.
Spurs over the next few Gameweeks
Chelsea away is a difficult entry point.
Managers should use it as information:
- Does Maddison start again?
- Does he reach 70+ minutes?
- Where does Marmoush play?
- Does Kulusevski come into the XI?
- Does Kudus stay advanced?
If those answers are positive, the fixture after Chelsea can become a much better buying moment.
Owners vs buyers
Existing Maddison owner
Hold and start if expected to begin.
Fresh Maddison buyer
Wait through Chelsea when possible.
Marmoush owner
Hold while the striker/wing hierarchy becomes clearer.
Kudus owner
Hold if his role remains advanced; one assist supports the process.
The threshold for holding is lower than the threshold for spending a new transfer.
FAQ
Are Tottenham players worth buying in FPL after beating Coventry?
Spurs have moved from avoid to watch. Maddison is the most interesting creator, Marmoush has goal upside and Kudus keeps an assist route, but Chelsea away in GW8 is not a strong chase fixture.
Is James Maddison a good FPL buy now?
He is back on the watchlist after scoring on his first league start in 536 days. Managers should confirm his minutes and set-piece role before buying.
What does Kulusevski's return mean for Spurs FPL?
It increases attacking depth and creativity but also adds competition for minutes. His return should make managers more cautious about assuming every Spurs attacker is secure.